I'm wondering about False Positives.
I've been noticing more of these across a different domains via email forwards (set in the OS CP).
I can find recurring emails (think: Newsletters, announcements, etc.) that have different SA scores (and other header information) when received by WF vs. now at OS.
Here's an example:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.097 tagged_above=-999 required=3 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.20
So I wonder:
Is this a known issue? (i.e.: SpamAssasain settings are purposly extra strict.)
Is there a way to train SA on false positives?
- How would that work with emails that have sensative information?
Any chance of white-listing, without resorting to emails having to be delivered to a Mail User + Procmail rules?
Possibly related posts: